Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8040276›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation1994

Selective reovirus infection of murine hepatocarcinoma cells during cell division. A model of viral liver infection.

J Taterka, M Sutcliffe, D H Rubin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J TaterkaDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.
M Sutcliffe
D H Rubin
Nashville VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007066 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JONATHAN P KATZ · 1986 to 2026
$11.7M
REOVIRUSES AS PROBES OF GUT MUCOSAL T-CELL RESPONSER01AI023970 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CEBRA, JOHN J · 1986 to 2001
$298k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-23970NIDDK NIH HHS T-32-DK-07066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reovirus type 1, strain Lang (1/L), can infect hepatocytes in vivo only after hepatocellular damage is induced by hepatotoxins, surgical trauma, resection, or profound immunosuppression. To examine the role of cell cycle and cellular differentiation on liver cell susceptibility to reovirus infection, a murine hepatocarcinoma cell line, Hepa 1/A1, was infected with reovirus and assayed for the presence of infectious virus or reovirus antigen in cells. Despite a > 95% binding of reovirus to hepatocarcinoma cells as indicated by cytometric analysis; only 10% of hepatoma cells contained infectious virus by infectious center assay. In comparison, 100% of L cells were infected. Analysis of intracellular reovirus antigen revealed its presence in dividing but not in quiescent hepatocytes. This correlation of cellular division and cell capacity to support viral replication suggests that induction of hepatocyte proliferation may be a mechanism for liver susceptibility to reovirus infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell DivisionDNA ReplicationLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, VirusReoviridae InfectionsVirus ReplicationReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID8040276
PMCPMC296316
OpenAlexW2133228764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.