Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8032648›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1994

The influence of the trigeminal ganglion on carotid blood flow in anaesthetized guinea-pigs.

D T Beattie, H E Connor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Parasympathetic reflex vasodilation in the cerebral hemodynamics of rats.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2014
    Article
  3. Occurrence of parasympathetic vasodilator fibers in the lower lip of the guinea-pig.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2008
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D T BeattiePharmacology II, Glaxo Research and Development Ltd, Ware, Herts.
H E Connor
University of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The influence of the trigeminal ganglion on the carotid circulation has been investigated by measuring electrical stimulation-induced alterations in carotid arterial blood flow and resistance in anaesthetized guinea-pigs. The effects of several receptor antagonists were assessed to determine which neurotransmitters are involved in regulating carotid blood flow. 2. Arterial blood pressure and carotid vascular resistance were reduced by electrical stimulation (0.5 mA, 1 ms, 5 Hz, 60 s) of the trigeminal ganglion ipsilateral to the carotid artery from which flow was measured. No consistent effect of electrical stimulation on carotid blood flow was observed. However, when guinea-pigs were pretreated with guanethidine (30 mg kg-1, s.c., 24 h prior to experiments), stimulation produced little change in blood pressure, while carotid blood flow was increased and vascular resistance decreased, consistent with vasodilatation in the cranial circulation. Stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion contralateral to the carotid artery from which blood flow was measured, had little effect on either carotid blood flow or vascular resistance. 3. In animals pretreated with guanethidine, intravenous administration of the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) receptor antagonist, [p-Cl-D-Phe6,Leu17]-VIP (50 micrograms kg-1) significantly attenuated the increase in carotid blood flow and decrease in carotid vascular resistance evoked by trigeminal ganglion stimulation. Responses evoked by trigeminal ganglion stimulation were, however, unaffected by intravenous injection of the tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists, GR82334 (0.3 mg kg-1) and CP-99,994 (0.4 mg kg-1), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, CGRP8-37 (0.9 mg kg-1) and the ganglion blocking agent, hexamethonium (10 mg kg-1). 4. It is concluded that in the guanethidine-pretreated guinea-pig, electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion increases carotid blood flow and produces an accompanying decrease in carotid vascular resistance, consistent with the dilatation of carotid blood vessels. The transmitter mediating this effect is most likely to be VIP.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnimalsBlood PressureCarotid ArteriesElectric StimulationGuanethidineGuinea PigsMaleMuscle, Smooth, VascularMuscle TonusNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal PeptideRegional Blood FlowTrigeminal GanglionVascular ResistanceGuanethidineNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide

Identifiers

PMID8032648
PMCPMC1910272
OpenAlexW2045825985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.