Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8032639›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1994

Effects of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor stimulation and antagonism on responses to isoprenaline of guinea-pig trachea in vitro.

N Watson, R M Eglen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Muscarinic receptors in equine airways.Veterinary research communications · 2002
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N WatsonSyntex Discovery Research, Institute of Pharmacology R2-101, Palo Alto, CA 94303.
R M Eglen
Institute of Organic Chemistry · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. In guinea-pig and canine airway smooth muscle, there is reduced beta-adrenoceptor agonist sensitivity in tissues pre-contracted with muscarinic agonists when compared to tissues pre-contracted with other spasmogens, such as histamine or leukotriene D4. This reduced sensitivity may be the result of an interaction between muscarinic receptors and beta-adrenoceptors. In this study the effects of M2 receptor antagonism and stimulation have been investigated on the relaxant potency of isoprenaline in guinea-pig isolated tracheal smooth muscle. 2. (+)-cis-Dioxolane contracted isolated tracheal strips in a concentration-dependent manner (EC50 = 11.5 +/- 0.9 nM). The rank order of antagonist apparent affinities (with pA2 values in parentheses) was atropine (9.4 +/- 0.1) > zamifenacin (8.2 +/- 0.1) > para-fluoro-hexahydro-siladiphenidol (p-F-HHSiD, 7.2 +/- 0.1) > pirenzepine (6.5 +/- 0.1) > methoctramine (5.5 +/- 0.1). Schild slopes were not significantly different from unity. This was consistent with a role of muscarinic M3 receptors in mediating contraction. 3. In tissues pre-contracted to 3 g isometric tension using (+)-cis-dioxolane (0.2 microM, approximately EC80), the relaxant potency of isoprenaline was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by 0.3 microM methoctramine (control EC50 = 32.2 +/- 4.3 nM, plus methoctramine EC50 = 19.1 +/- 4.5 nM). This concentration of methoctramine had no effect on contractile responses to (+)-cis-dioxolane (control, EC50 = 17.6 +/- 3.2 nM, plus methoctramine, EC50 = 21.0 +/- 4.4 nM). 4 When acetylcholine (non-selective), (+)-cis-dioxolane (non-selective), L-660,863 ((+/- )-3-(3-amino-1,2,4-oxadiazole-5-yl)-quinuclidine, M2-selective) or SDZ ENS 163 (thiopilocarpine, mixed M2 antagonist,partial M3 agonist) were used to achieve isometric tensions of 3 g, the relaxant potency of isoprenaline ranged from 3.7 +/- 0.3 nM (SDZ ENS 163) to 49.4 +/- 3.2 nM ((+)-cis-dioxolane). Reducing the concentration of these agonists (and therefore the level of developed tension to 2 g), significantly(P<0.05) increased the relaxant potency of isoprenaline. In contrast, when histamine was used to pre-contract tissues to either 2 or 3 g (EC50 = 4.2 +/- 0.6 and 3.8 +/- 1.1 nM, respectively), there was no significant effect on the relaxant potency of isoprenaline.5. There was a slight but significant (P<0.05) reduction in the relaxant potency of isoprenaline, in tissues pre-contracted to 3 g using histamine in combination with (+ )-cis-dioxolane (30 nM). This effect was reversed by M2 receptor antagonism, using methoctramine (1 MicroM).6. These data suggest that in guinea-pig isolated trachea, the relaxant potency of isoprenaline may depend not only on the level of developed tension but also, on the level of muscarinic M2 receptor stimulation/blockade of the spasmogen inducing the tension. However, the lack of selective M2 agonist and the low M2/M3 selectivity of antagonists in this tissue do not permit definitive conclusions to be made about the role of these receptors in modulating isoprenaline potency.

Indexed as

Muscarinic AntagonistsAnimalsDiaminesDioxolanesGuinea PigsHistamineIn Vitro TechniquesIsometric ContractionIsoproterenolMaleMuscle RelaxationMuscle, SmoothParasympatholyticsPiperidinesReceptors, MuscarinicTrachea4-fluorohexahydrosiladifenidolDiaminesDioxolanesHistamineIsoproterenolmethoctramineMuscarinic AntagonistsParasympatholyticsPiperidinesReceptors, Muscarinic

Identifiers

PMID8032639
PMCPMC1910305
OpenAlexW2003919372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.