Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8030742›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology1994

Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar.

H P Ehrlich, A Desmoulière, R F Diegelmann, I K Cohen, C C Compton, W L Garner, Y Kapanci, G Gabbiani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07397520 (The Application of Intralesional 5-fluorouracil for the Management of Hypertrophic Facial Scars in the Periocular Region Resulting From Trauma and Surgical Procedures in Individuals Aged Over 18 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07397520 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Application of Intralesional 5-fluorouracil for the Management of Hypertrophic Facial Scars in the Periocular Region Resulting From Trauma and Surgical Procedures in Individuals Aged Over 18 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de ValencianaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled7ConditionsFacial ScarringArmsIntralesional administration of 5-fluorouracil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 533 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Collaborative Duality of CircGLIS3(2) RNA and Protein in human Wound Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Update on the Pathogenesis of Keloid Formation.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024
    Review
  9. An Update on Molecular Mechanisms of Scarring-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fibrosis in burns: an overview of mechanisms and therapies.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Autocrine IL-6 drives cell and extracellular matrix anisotropy in scar fibroblasts.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of the skin keloid microenvironment.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  18. Topical captopril: a promising treatment for secondary lymphedema.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The Role of Myofibroblasts in Physiological and Pathological Tissue Repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H P EhrlichDepartment of Surgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
A Desmoulière
R F Diegelmann
I K Cohen
C C Compton
W L Garner
Y Kapanci
G Gabbiani
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two types of excessive scarring, keloid and hypertrophic scar. Contrary to hypertrophic scars, keloids do not regress with time, are difficult to revise surgically, and do not provoke scar contractures. These two lesions require different therapeutic approaches but are often confused because of an apparent lack of morphological differences. We have investigated the collagen organization and the possible presence of alpha-smooth muscle (SM) actin-expressing myofibroblasts in these conditions. Keloids contain large, thick collagen fibers composed of numerous fibrils closely packed together. In contrast hypertrophic scars exhibit modular structures in which fibroblastic cells, small vessels, and fine, randomly organized collagen fibers are present. We confirm that such nodular structures are always present in hypertrophic scar and rarely in keloid. Furthermore, only nodules of hypertrophic scars contain alpha-SM actin-expressing myofibroblasts. Electron microscopic examination supports the above-mentioned differences in collagen organization and in fibroblastic features and shows the presence of an amorphous extracellular material surrounding fibroblastic cells in keloid. The presence in hypertrophic scar myofibroblasts of alpha-SM actin, the actin isoform typical of vascular SM cells, may represent an important element in the pathogenesis of contraction. Interestingly, when placed in culture fibroblasts from hypertrophic scars and keloid express similar amounts of alpha-SM actin, suggesting that local microenvironmental factors influence in vivo the expression of this protein. Thus several morphological and immunohistochemical differences exist between hypertrophic scar and keloid that are useful for the biological and pathological characterization of the two lesions.

Indexed as

ActinsAdolescentAdultChildCicatrix, HypertrophicCollagenFibroblastsHumansKeloidMicroscopy, ElectronActinsCollagen

Identifiers

PMID8030742
PMCPMC1887298
OpenAlexW1557011207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.