Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8027344›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1994

Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system.

G E Pfyffer, P Kissling, R Wirth, R Weber

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Where We Are?Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2016
    Review
  7. Molecular Mycobacteriology and Expansion in Disease Diagnosis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Serum ferroxidase albumin ratio as a marken in pulmonary tuberculosis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical evaluation of a commercial ligase-based gene amplification method for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1998
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G E PfyfferSwiss National Center for Mycobacteria, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich.
P Kissling
R Wirth
R Weber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 938 respiratory specimens (633 sputa, 249 bronchial and tracheal aspirates, and 56 bronchoalveolar lavages) from 589 patients were tested for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (MTD), and the results were compared with those of the conventional methods of fluorescence microscopy and cultivation (solid and radiometric media). One series of specimens (n = 515) was decontaminated with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH: the other one (n = 423) was decontaminated with sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate (SDS)-NaOH. Of the specimens decontaminated with NALC, 39 were MTD and culture positive, 455 were MTD and culture negative, 18 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 3 were MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 96.2% for the MTD. Of the specimens decontaminated with SDS, 35 were MTD and culture positive, 372 were MTD and culture negative, 15 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 1 was MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 97.2% and a specificity of 96.1% for the MTD. After resolution of discrepant results by review of the patients' clinical data, the sensitivity of the MTD was 93.9%, the specificity was 97.6%, the positive predictive value was 80.7%, and the negative predictive value was 99.3% for the NALC series; the corresponding values were 97.4, 96.9, 76.0, and 99.7%, respectively, for the SDS series. In conclusion, the MTD is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting M. tuberculosis complex within hours in both smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory specimens.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChild, PreschoolDiagnostic ErrorsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedMolecular Probe TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisRespiratory Tract InfectionsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID8027344
PMCPMC263163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.