Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8024291›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood1993

Primary immunisations in Liverpool. I: Who withholds consent?

M Pearson, K Makowiecka, J Gregg, J Woollard, M Rogers, C West

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary immunisations in Liverpool.Archives of disease in childhood · 1994
    Article
  4. Primary immunisations in Liverpool.Archives of disease in childhood · 1994
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M PearsonDepartment of General Practice, University of Liverpool.
K Makowiecka
J Gregg
J Woollard
M Rogers
C West
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between parents in Liverpool consenting to their children being invited for primary immunisations and five sociodemographic factors, namely sex, position of child in the family, family type, migration into Liverpool since birth, and local deprivation was examined. Rates of consent to invitation were over 97% for each antigen except pertussis, which had a consent rate of 83%. Consent to invitation for pertussis vaccine was least likely to have been given for boys, children with older siblings, those recorded as living with a single parent, and those in the most deprived areas. Local deprivation also had an effect on consent to the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Migration into Liverpool had a significant effect on consent to invitation for all antigens except pertussis. The child's sex, family type, and local deprivation had no effect on consent to diphtheria, tetanus, and polio immunisations. Maximising pertussis vaccine uptake will require more attention to be paid to those parents who have been identified as being less likely to give consent. It is particularly important that consistent and clear advice about immunisations is made available to parents with two or more children, lone parents, and those living in materially deprived areas. Our findings challenge some of the assumptions underlying the principles of 'first parent visiting', at least so far as pertussis is concerned.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBirth OrderChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCooperative BehaviorDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDrug CombinationsEnglandFemaleHumansImmunizationInformed ConsentMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles VaccineMumps VaccineDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDrug CombinationsMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles VaccineMumps VaccinePoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedRubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID8024291
PMCPMC1029421
OpenAlexW2028591786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.