ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994
Experimental control of neoplastic progression in cell populations: Foulds' rules revisited.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- When DNA Mutations Interplay with Cellular Proliferation: A Narrative History of Theories of Carcinogenesis.Cancers · 2024Review
- GLI1+ perivascular, renal, progenitor cells: The likely source of spontaneous neoplasia that created the AGMK1-9T7 cell line.PloS one · 2023Article
- Single-cell sequencing deciphers a convergent evolution of copy number alterations from primary to circulating tumor cells.Genome research · 2017Article
- Cell-cell contact interactions conditionally determine suppression and selection of the neoplastic phenotype.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Coculturing diverse clonal populations prevents the early-stage neoplastic progression that occurs in the separate clones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000Article
- Relation of the slow growth phenotype to neoplastic transformation: possible significance for human cancer.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 1999Article
- Clonal dynamics of progressive neoplastic transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999Article
- The cellular ecology of progressive neoplastic transformation: a clonal analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999Article
- Selective killing of preneoplastic and neoplastic cells by methotrexate with leucovorin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998Article
- Cellular aging, destabilization, and cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996Article
- Neoplastic development: paradoxical relation between impaired cell growth at low population density and excessive growth at high density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1995Article
- Incipient and overt stages of neoplastic transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foulds introduced six rules of tumor progression based on his observations of spontaneous mammary cancer in mice and generalized them to all forms of neoplasia [Foulds, L. (1954) Cancer Res. 14, 327-339 and Foulds, L. (1969) Neoplastic Development (Academic, New York), Vol. 1, preface and pp. 72-74.] Rules III, IV, and V are considered controversial, and research in animals seems inadequate to resolve the controversies. A subline of NIH 3T3 cells undergoes progressive transformation to produce foci of increasing population density when repeatedly constrained by sequential rounds of growth to and maintenance at confluence. Analysis of the results provides a cellular basis for rules III, IV, and V. Rule III states that progression is independent of the growth of the tumor and occurs in tumors that are arrested. Cell culture shows that progression is actually favored by constraint of growth, a result inconsistent with a major role for point mutations in progression. Indeed, there is a suggestion that the transformation may arise from chromatin changes preceding apoptosis. Rule IV states that progression can be gradual or abrupt but the latter conclusion has been frequently criticized. Cell culture exhibits both forms of progression but, in particular, eliminates the doubt about the abrupt form. Rule V, which is in a sense an extension of rule IV, states that progression follows one of alternative paths of development. The results in culture indicate that every independent transforming event gives rise to foci of unique morphology. Thus, even for the single characteristic of transformed focus morphology, many alternative paths to neoplasia are available to cells. In addition to clarifying the rules of progression, a method is described for pinpointing the time of the occurrence of events that are only expressed as dense foci after a variable lag time. The results in culture reinforce Foulds' conclusion that neoplastic development is primarily an epigenetically driven process and identify some of the cellular interactions that underlie that process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.