Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8022827›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Experimental control of neoplastic progression in cell populations: Foulds' rules revisited.

H Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cell-cell contact interactions conditionally determine suppression and selection of the neoplastic phenotype.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  5. Coculturing diverse clonal populations prevents the early-stage neoplastic progression that occurs in the separate clones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clonal dynamics of progressive neoplastic transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  8. The cellular ecology of progressive neoplastic transformation: a clonal analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  9. Selective killing of preneoplastic and neoplastic cells by methotrexate with leucovorin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  10. Cellular aging, destabilization, and cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1996
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Incipient and overt stages of neoplastic transformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H RubinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-3206.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foulds introduced six rules of tumor progression based on his observations of spontaneous mammary cancer in mice and generalized them to all forms of neoplasia [Foulds, L. (1954) Cancer Res. 14, 327-339 and Foulds, L. (1969) Neoplastic Development (Academic, New York), Vol. 1, preface and pp. 72-74.] Rules III, IV, and V are considered controversial, and research in animals seems inadequate to resolve the controversies. A subline of NIH 3T3 cells undergoes progressive transformation to produce foci of increasing population density when repeatedly constrained by sequential rounds of growth to and maintenance at confluence. Analysis of the results provides a cellular basis for rules III, IV, and V. Rule III states that progression is independent of the growth of the tumor and occurs in tumors that are arrested. Cell culture shows that progression is actually favored by constraint of growth, a result inconsistent with a major role for point mutations in progression. Indeed, there is a suggestion that the transformation may arise from chromatin changes preceding apoptosis. Rule IV states that progression can be gradual or abrupt but the latter conclusion has been frequently criticized. Cell culture exhibits both forms of progression but, in particular, eliminates the doubt about the abrupt form. Rule V, which is in a sense an extension of rule IV, states that progression follows one of alternative paths of development. The results in culture indicate that every independent transforming event gives rise to foci of unique morphology. Thus, even for the single characteristic of transformed focus morphology, many alternative paths to neoplasia are available to cells. In addition to clarifying the rules of progression, a method is described for pinpointing the time of the occurrence of events that are only expressed as dense foci after a variable lag time. The results in culture reinforce Foulds' conclusion that neoplastic development is primarily an epigenetically driven process and identify some of the cellular interactions that underlie that process.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionCell Transformation, NeoplasticModels, Biological3T3 CellsAnimalsCulture TechniquesMiceTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID8022827
PMCPMC44254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.