Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8016128›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1994

Evidence that most human Alu sequences were inserted in a process that ceased about 30 million years ago.

R J Britten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. LINEs and SINEs of primate evolution.Evolutionary anthropology · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Majority of divergence between closely related DNA samples is due to indels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R J BrittenDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Corona del Mar 92625.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primate Alu interspersed repeats can be subdivided into classes on the basis of shared nucleotides at a set of diagnostic positions. Each of the classes of Alu sequences is apparently the result of past retrotransposition of transcripts of highly conserved class-specific source genes that differed from each other at the diagnostic positions. The nucleotides at the majority of positions are identical among the source genes and therefore were identical among all of the Alu sequences at the time of their insertion. These CONSBI (conserved before insertion) positions are useful because the changes that have occurred after insertion are recognizable and the divergence resulting from nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions is informative. The divergence of Alu sequences at the CONSBI positions is a measure of the time since a class was inserted. The greatest majority of Alu sequences are in one class (identified as class II), and it is particularly suitable for such examination, since nearly full-length sequences are now known for nearly a thousand members of this class. The average divergence of class II members indicates that the class has an average age of about 40 million years. The distribution in divergence of class II accurately fits a sum of two Poisson distributions. The implication is that class II Alu sequences were derived from two massive past events of insertion of many Alu sequences. In this model the younger subset of class II sequences (corresponding to about 300,000 copies in the genome) has an average divergence of 5% at CONSBI positions. The older set of class II sequences (corresponding to about 150,000 genomic copies) has a 9% average divergence. Based on the drift rate of primate DNA sequences, the events of insertion probably occurred 30-50 million years ago. The goodness of the fit to the Poisson distribution indicates that no significant number of members of class II have been inserted since 30 million years ago.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VariationAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceDNAHominidaeHumansModels, GeneticPoisson DistributionPrimatesTimeDNADNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID8016128
PMCPMC44155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.