Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8005183›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1994

Influence of input rates on (+/-)-isradipine haemodynamics and concentration-effect relationship in healthy volunteers.

V Carrara, H Porchet, P Dayer

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2014
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V CarraraDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
H Porchet
P Dayer
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the magnitude of the response to a drug may depend upon the drug input rate, the concentration-effect relationship of the new dihydropyridine (+/-)-isradipine was investigated using different administration modalities. Ten normotensive healthy volunteers were given, double-blind and in a crossover fashion, isradipine as a 1 mg iv infusion, 5 mg oral solution, 5 mg standard tablet, 10 mg slow release formulation, and a placebo. Blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma isradipine concentrations were recorded for 24 h. The maximal fall in diastolic blood pressure was similar after the infusion (-11.40 mmHg), the oral solution (-15.20 mmHg), and the standard tablet (-12.50 mmHg). In healthy volunteers the slow release form had no significant effect on blood pressure. The concentration-effect plots showed an increasing slope in the order infusion, solution, and table, and anticlockwise hysteresis. This was partly due to marked heart rate counter-regulation, the corresponding mean maximal heart rate increases being 24, 19, and 17 beats.min-1. The pronounced counter-regulation of the heart rate implies that a slow isradipine input rate would be more effective in decreasing blood pressure.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultBlood PressureDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHalf-LifeHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansInfusions, IntravenousIsradipineMaleSolutionsStereoisomerismTabletsDelayed-Action PreparationsIsradipineSolutionsTablets

Identifiers

PMID8005183
OpenAlexW2024480588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.