Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8001793›Full record

ArticleGenetics1994

SPO13 negatively regulates the progression of mitotic and meiotic nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

R M McCarroll, R E Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spo13 regulates cohesin cleavage.Genes & development · 2002
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic evidence for a complete sexual cycle in Candida albicans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R M McCarrollDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
R E Esposito

Funding

Regulation of Meiotic DevelopmentR01GM029182 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ESPOSITO, ROCHELLE E · 1985 to 2005
$1.6M
SPO13 FUNCTION IN MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATIONF32GM011798 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MCCARROLL, ROBERT M · 1987 to 1990
–
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM29182NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM11798-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meiosis-specific yeast gene SPO13 has been previously shown to be required to obtain two successive divisions in meiosis. We report here that vegetative expression of this gene causes a CDC28-dependent cell-cycle arrest at mitosis. Overexpression of SPO13 during meiosis causes a transient block to completion of the meiosis I division and suppresses the inability of cdc28ts strains to execute meiosis II. The spo13 defect can be partially suppressed by conditions that slow progression of the first meiotic division. Based on the results presented below, we propose that SPO13 acts as a meiotic timing function by transiently blocking progression through the meiosis I division, thereby allowing (1) coordination of the first division with assembly of the reductional segregation apparatus, and (2) subsequent entry into a second round of segregation to separate replicated sister chromatids without an intervening S-phase.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalCell CycleCell NucleusCloning, MolecularGene ExpressionMeiosisMitosisModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID8001793
PMCPMC1206137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.