ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1994
Use of the iso-inertial force mass relationship in the prediction of dynamic human performance.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests.European journal of applied physiology · 2004Trial
- Relationship between shot put performance and triceps brachii fiber type composition and power production.European journal of applied physiology · 2003Trial
- The specificity of strength training: the effect of posture.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1996Trial
- Maximal strength measurement: A critical evaluation of common methods-a narrative review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Review
- Strength Training in Swimming.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- The Relationship between Isometric Force-Time Characteristics and Dynamic Performance: A Systematic Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Core and skin temperature influences on the surface electromyographic responses to an isometric force and position task.PloS one · 2018Article
- Methods of Power-Force-Velocity Profiling During Sprint Running: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
- Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Review
- The development of a repetition-load scheme for the eccentric-only bench press exercise.Journal of human kinetics · 2013Article
- Acute effects of passive stretching on the electromechanical delay and evoked twitch properties.European journal of applied physiology · 2010Article
- Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation : acute metabolic responses.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2006Review
- Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2005Review
- Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002Review
- The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 1996Review
- Poor correlations between isometric tests and dynamic performance: relationship to muscle activation.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1996Article
- Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 1995Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to develop a new test of muscle function, termed the iso-inertial force-mass relationship, and to determine its relationship to dynamic physical performance in comparison to an isometric test. A group of 13 trained subjects performed an isometric, and a series of iso-inertial maximal upper body tests, in a bench press movement at loads of 30%, 60%, 100% (concentric) and 100%, 130% and 150% (eccentric) of maximum. Vertical forces exerted throughout the movement were recorded by a force plate. In addition, the subjects performed the following three performance tests: a maximal bench press, a seated shotput, and two drop bench-press throws from a height of 0.25 m, with loads of 10 kg and 30% of maximum. Correlation analysis demonstrated that in each instance the iso-inertial force mass tests were the best predictors of performance (r = 0.78-0.88) with both contraction type and mass specific effects apparent. Maximal isometric force and rate of force development were significantly related to some performance variables (r = 0.22-0.78). However, for all the performance movements assessed, the iso-inertial test modality recorded the highest relationship to performance. The difference in the relationship between performance and iso-inertial and isometric test modalities was particularly evident in the light load dynamic performance of the seated shotput (r = 0.86 vs r = 0.38, respectively). These results are explained in part by the neural and mechanical differences between iso-inertial and isometric muscle actions and their respective specificity to dynamic physical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8001538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.