ArticleCell and tissue research1994
Three patterns of distribution characterize the organization of endothelial microfilaments at aortic flow dividers.
Article in Cell and tissue research, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms are probably formed to decrease the abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses caused by direct flow impaction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Remodeling of the Microvasculature: May the Blood Flow Be With You.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Computational flow dynamics in a geometric model of intussusceptive angiogenesis.Microvascular research · 2009Article
- Effects of disturbed flow on endothelial cells.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since actin microfilaments are essential in the maintenance of endothelial integrity and in the repair of injured endothelium, we have carried out a detailed study of the distribution of microfilaments in the immediate vicinity of aortic branches. Branches are of major interest because there is a predilection for atherosclerotic lesions near branch ostia. We made an extensive, systematic examination of branches of the aorta and iliac arteries using in situ staining of perfusion-fixed arteries. Microfilaments were localized using rhodamine phalloidin. Three patterns of staining were observed. Some endothelial cells showed prominent central stress fibers. Others had few central stress fibers but prominent peripheral fibers. Still others showed an intermediate pattern with some central and some peripheral fibers present. At small branch sites, the lip of the divider was more blunt, and there were more cells with peripheral actin. At large branches, cells with peripheral actin were confined mainly to the lip, while there were many more cells with prominent central fibers. We also found that major differences can occur over very small distances, so adjacent cells may have strikingly different patterns of microfilament distribution. These patterns appear to reflect the geometry of the flow divider and local variations in hemodynamic shear stress. The differences in microfilament distribution may reflect differences in endothelial functions which are essential in maintaining endothelial integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8001079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.