ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1994
Bone disorders following total gastrectomy.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The change of bone mineral density and bone metabolism after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- International Delphi consensus guidelines for follow-up after prophylactic total gastrectomy: the Life after Prophylactic Total Gastrectomy (LAP-TG) study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022Article
- Small intestine bacterial overgrowth and metabolic bone disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2001Article
- Does bone change after biliopancreatic diversion?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary TractArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone disorders following gastrectomy were studied by measuring absolute and relative bone mineral density of the Wards triangle, serum 1,25-(OH)2-D, alkaline phosphatase, and total serum calcium. The subjects were 20 males who had undergone total gastrectomy not more than three months previously (group A1). Seventeen of these patients were reviewed three years later (group A2). Absolute and relative bone density were significantly lower in group A2 than in A1 (0.52 +/- 0.011 g/cm2 versus 0.6 +/- 0.014 g/cm2, P < 0.01 and 85.5 +/- 1.4% age-matched control versus 95 +/- 1.3%, P < 0.01). 1,25-(OH)2-D was significantly lower in group A2 than in group A1 (14.3 +/- 0.97 pg/ml versus 20.6 +/- 1.02 pg/ml, P < 0.01). There was no difference in alkaline phosphatase and calcium serum concentration. The mean weight loss was 6.26 +/- 0.57% over the follow-up period, and weight loss correlated with absolute and relative bone density (r = -0.74, P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between 1,25-(OH)2-D and absolute or relative bone density (r = 0.67, r = 0.62 and P < 0.01). These data suggest that bone density decrease has already occurred three years after total gastrectomy and is positively correlated to 1,25-(OH)2-D deficiency. As no differences in serum alkaline phosphatase and serum calcium concentration were found, these factors are of little value for the early detection of postgastrectomy bone disorders, whereas weight loss is a valuable screening parameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7995172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.