Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7988289›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1994

Structure, molecular evolution and maintenance of copy number of extended repeated structures in the X-heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.

D I Nurminsky, Shevelyov YYa, S V Nuzhdin, V A Gvozdev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diverse DNA transposons in rotifers of the class Bdelloidea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D I NurminskyInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Shevelyov YYa
S V Nuzhdin
V A Gvozdev
Institute of Molecular Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 60 kb repeats located in the distal heterochromatin of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster were cloned in overlapping cosmids. These regions, designated as SCLRs, comprised the following types of repeated elements: Stellate genes, which are known to be involved in spermatogenesis; copia-like retrotransposons; LINE elements, including amplified Type I rDNA insertions; and rDNA fragments. The following steps in SCLR formation were hypothesized: insertion of mobile elements into the rDNA and Stellate gene clusters; internal tandem duplication events; recombination between the rDNA cluster and Stellate tandem repeat; and amplification of the whole SCLR structure. There are about nine SCLR copies per haploid genome, but there is approximately a twofold variation in copy number between fly stocks. The SCLR copy number differences between closely related stocks are suggested to be the result of unequal sister chromatid exchange (USCE). The restricted variation in SCLR copy number between unrelated stocks and the absence of chromosomes free of SCLRs suggests that natural selection is active in copy number maintenance.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionX ChromosomeAnimalsBase SequenceCells, CulturedCloning, MolecularDNA, RibosomalDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGene AmplificationHeterochromatinMolecular Sequence DataDNA, RibosomalDNA Transposable ElementsHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID7988289
OpenAlexW1967344792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.