ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1994
Assessment of liver metabolic function. Clinical implications.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiologically based modelling of inhibition of metabolism and assessment of the relative potency of drug and metabolite: dextromethorphan vs. dextrorphan using quinidine inhibition.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2003Trial
- Caffeine test in predicting flutamide-induced hepatic injury in patients with prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2002Trial
- Reliability of the omeprazole hydroxylation index for CYP2C19 phenotyping: possible effect of age, liver disease and length of therapy.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1999Trial
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of Muscle and Liver Reveals Key Molecular Pathways Influencing Growth Traits in Zhedong White Geese.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI based radiomics combined with clinical variables in stratifying hepatic functional reserve in HBV infected patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Decreases Microsomal Liver Function in the Absence of Fibrosis.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- AFB1 Induced Transcriptional Regulation Related to Apoptosis and Lipid Metabolism in Liver of Chicken.Toxins · 2020Article
- Korean Red Ginseng and Korean black ginseng extracts, JP5 and BG1, prevent hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation induced by environmental heat stress.Journal of ginseng research · 2020Article
- Long Non-coding RNA and mRNA Profile of Liver Tissue During Four Developmental Stages in the Chicken.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Transcriptome profiling of the liver among the prenatal and postnatal stages in chickens.Poultry science · 2019Article
- Hepatic progenitor cell activation is induced by the depletion of the gut microbiome in mice.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Alpha-l-fucosidase: a novel serum biomarker to predict prognosis in early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Dynamic carbon 13 breath tests for the study of liver function and gastric emptying.Gastroenterology report · 2015Review
- Liver involvement in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: can breath test unmask impaired hepatic first-pass effect?Internal and emergency medicine · 2012Article
- The LiMAx test: a new liver function test for predicting postoperative outcome in liver surgery.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2010Article
- Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008Review
- Liver function evaluation in dogs by the galactose load test.Veterinary research communications · 2005Article
- Lack of interaction of milnacipran with the cytochrome p450 isoenzymes frequently involved in the metabolism of antidepressants.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Article
- Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by therapeutic drugs.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2005Review
- Different alterations of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform and its gene expression in livers of patients with chronic liver diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter- and intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of most drugs is largely determined by variable liver function as described by parameters of hepatic blood flow and metabolic capacity. These parameters may be altered as a result of disease affecting the liver, genetic differences in metabolising enzymes, and various types of drug interactions, including enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition or down-regulation. With the now known large number of drug metabolising enzymes, their differential substrate specificity, and their differential induction or inhibition, each test substance of liver function should be used as a probe for its specific metabolising enzyme. Thus, the concept of model test-substances providing general information about liver function has severe limitations. To test the metabolic activity of several enzymes, either several test substances may be given (cocktail approach) or several metabolites of a single test substance may be analysed (metabolic fingerprint approach). The enzyme-specific analysis of liver function results in a preference for analysis of the metabolites rather than analysis of the clearance of the parent test substance. There are specific methods to quantify the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19MEPH, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A, and phase II enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, glucuronyl-transferases or N-acetyltransferases, in vivo. Interactions based on competitive or noncompetitive inhibition should be analysed specifically for the cytochrome P450 enzyme involved. At least 5 different types of cytochrome P450 enzyme induction may result in major variability of hepatic function; this may be quantified by biochemical parameters, clearance methods, or highly enzyme-specific methods such as Western blot analysis or molecular biological techniques such as mRNA quantification in blood and tissues. Therapeutic drug monitoring is already implicitly used for quantification of the enzyme activities relevant for a specific drug. Selective impairment of hepatic enzymes due to gene mutations may have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs similar to that caused by cirrhosis. Assessment of this heritable source of variability in liver function is possible by in vivo or ex vivo enzymological methods. For genetically polymorphic enzymes and carrier proteins involved in drug disposition, molecular genetic methods using a patient's blood sample may be used for classification of the individual into: (i) the impaired or poor metaboliser (homozygous deficient); (ii) the extensive (homozygous active) metaboliser group; and (iii) the moderately extensive metaboliser (heterozygous) group. For hepatic blood flow determinations, galactose or sorbitol given at relatively low doses may be much better indicators than the indocyanine green.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.