Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7978355›Full record

ArticleAnatomy and embryology1994

The unipolar brush cells of the rat cerebellar cortex and cochlear nucleus are calretinin-positive: a study by light and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry.

A Floris, M Diño, D M Jacobowitz, E Mugnaini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Continuum of Response Properties across the Population of Unipolar Brush Cells in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Temporal Expression ofFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A FlorisLaboratory of Neuromorphology, Biobehavioral Sciences Graduate Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-4154.
M Diño
D M Jacobowitz
E Mugnaini
University of Connecticut · USCenter for Scientific Review · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY OF ACOUSTIC BRAINSTEM MICROCIRCUITSR01DC001805 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI MUGNAINI, ENRICO · 1993 to 1996
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC 01805NINDS NIH HHS NS 09904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell class-specific markers are powerful tools for the study of individual neuronal populations. The peculiar unipolar brush cells of the mammalian cerebellar cortex have only recently been definitively identified by means of the Golgi method, and we have explored markers of cerebellar neurons with the purpose of facilitating the analysis of this new cell population and, especially, its distribution and ultrastructural features. By light microscopic immunocytochemistry, we demonstrate that, in the rat, the unipolar brush cells are the cortical neurons that are most densely immunostained with antiserum to calretinin, a recently discovered calcium-binding protein. The unipolar brush cells are highly concentrated in the flocculo-nodular lobe, the ventral uvula and the ventral paraflocculus, occur at relatively high density in the lingula, at moderate-to-low density in other folia of the vermis and in the narrow intermediate cortex, and at low to very low density, with the exception of a few hot spots, in the lateral regions of the cerebellar hemispheres and in the dorsal paraflocculus. Unipolar brush cells are also found in the cochlear nucleus. In addition to the unipolar brush cells, calretinin antibody distinctly stains certain mossy fibers, and weakly to moderately stains other cerebellar elements, such as granule neurons and climbing fibers. In the lobules containing high densities of unipolar brush cells, the granule cell bodies and the parallel fibers are much less immunoreactive, and there are many more densely immunostained mossy fibers than in the lobules, where these cells are rare, which suggests some relationships between these elements. In the cerebellar nuclei, small neurons are densely immunostained, while large neurons are immunonegative. The unipolar brush cells reside nearly exclusively in the granular layer. They are small neurons, intermediate in size between granule cells and Golgi cells, and their features are remarkably similar across all lobules. They usually have a single, relatively thick dendrite of varying length that terminates in a brush-like tip consisting of several short branchlets. Utilizing a pre-embedding protocol, we have identified unipolar brush cells with the electron microscope. The cytoplasm of these cells is partially obscured by the electron dense product of calretinin immunoreaction in all regions of the soma and processes. The cells are often covered with non-synaptic appendages and contain a peculiar cytoplasmic inclusion consisting of ringlet subunits. Other characteristic components are numerous neurofilaments, mitochondria and large, dense-core vesicles. Individual brushes enter one or two glomeruli, where the dendritic branchlets establish an unusually extensive synapse with mossy fiber rosettes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Indexed as

AnimalsCalbindin 2Cerebral CortexCochlear NucleusFemaleGolgi ApparatusImmunohistochemistryMaleMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronNerve Tissue ProteinsRatsS100 Calcium Binding Protein GCalb2 protein, ratCalbindin 2Nerve Tissue ProteinsS100 Calcium Binding Protein G

Identifiers

PMID7978355
OpenAlexW2004554306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.