Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7953600›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology1994

Cerebellar agenesis.

M Glickstein

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
33.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Small but Mighty: Ten Myths and Misunderstandings About the Cerebellum.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Optogenetic Revolution in Cerebellar Investigations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Woman Born Without a Cerebellum: A Real-Life Case Adapted for Use in an Undergraduate Developmental and Systems Neuroscience Course.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Complex I deficiency due to loss of Ndufs4 in the brain results in progressive encephalopathy resembling Leigh syndrome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GlicksteinDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesions of the cerebellum produce profound deficits in movement. Since there is demonstrable recovery from partial lesions, some have asserted that the cerebellum may not be necessary for normal movement. It is even alleged that people may not manifest any motor symptoms despite total cerebellar agenesis. The literature points to a different conclusion. Cerebellar agenesis is always associated with profound motor deficits. A case of cerebellar agenesis of a man who died in 1951 is discussed. Evidence is presented that it is this case which gave rise to part of the oral tradition which alleges that normal movement is possible despite total cerebellar agenesis. In this brain an MRI scan revealed a small residual cerebellum. Moreover, despite an oral tradition to the contrary, there is absolutely no evidence about the motor capacities of this man during his life.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellumChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovement Disorders

Identifiers

PMID7953600
OpenAlexW4237293301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.