Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7950612›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1994

Randomised controlled trial of enalapril and beta blockers in non-diabetic chronic renal failure.

T Hannedouche, P Landais, B Goldfarb, N el Esper, A Fournier, M Godin, D Durand, J Chanard, F Mignon, J M Suo

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Assessing the Validity of Surrogate Outcomes for ESRD: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Early change in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for kidney disease progression: an individual patient meta-analysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Early change in proteinuria as a surrogate outcome in kidney disease progression: a systematic review of previous analyses and creation of a patient-level pooled dataset.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Evidence-based practice guideline for the treatment of CKD.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2009
    Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Impact of the preintervention rate of renal function decline on outcome of renoprotective intervention.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2008
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Role of hypertension in progression of pediatric CKD.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  13. Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Diagnosis 101: diabetic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T HannedoucheDepartment of Nephrology, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
P Landais
B Goldfarb
N el Esper
A Fournier
M Godin
D Durand
J Chanard
F Mignon
J M Suo
Hôpital Maison Blanche · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the ability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers to slow the development of end stage renal failure in non-diabetic patients with chronic renal failure.

designOpen randomised multicentre trial with three year follow up.

settingOutpatient departments of six French hospitals. PATIENTS: 100 hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure (initial serum creatinine 200-400 mumol/l. 52 randomised to enalapril and 48 to beta blockers (conventional treatment).

interventionsEnalapril or beta blocker was combined with frusemide and, if necessary, a calcium blocker or centrally acting drug in patients whose diastolic pressure remained above 90 mm Hg.

results17 patients receiving conventional treatment and 10 receiving enalapril developed end stage renal failure. The cumulative renal survival rate was significantly better in the enalapril group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The slope of the reciprocal serum creatinine concentration was steeper in the conventionally treated patients (-6.89 x 10(-5)l/mumol/month) than in the enalapril group (-4.17 x 10(-5)l/mumol/month; P < 0.05). No difference in blood pressure was found between groups.

conclusionIn hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure enalapril slows progression towards end stage renal failure compared with beta blockers. This effect was probably not mediated through controlling blood pressure.

Indexed as

AcebutololAdolescentAdultAgedAtenololBlood PressureBody WeightEnalaprilFemaleHumansHypertensionKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPotassiumProteinuriaAcebutololAtenololEnalaprilPotassium

Identifiers

PMID7950612
PMCPMC2541105
OpenAlexW2087709498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.