ReviewAnnals of hematology1994
Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction--selected recent developments.
Review in Annals of hematology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombin inhibitors from different animals.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Review
- Bolus thrombolytic infusion during prolonged refractory cardiac arrest of undiagnosed cause.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2006Article
- Crystal structure of the human alpha-thrombin-haemadin complex: an exosite II-binding inhibitor.The EMBO journal · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombolytic therapy is the established treatment of choice for most eligible patients with acute myocardial infarction. Early initiation of treatment and early, complete and maintained patency of the infarct-related coronary artery are desirable, because these variables correlate with a reduction in mortality. As a consequence, considerable efforts have been undertaken to develop new pharmacological agents that serve these purposes. Among these, new plasminogen activators such as reteplase (r-PA), saruplase (scuPA), and staphylokinase are in clinical development, and DSPA (bat t-PA) and antibody-targeted plasminogen activators (ScuPA-59D8) have undergone extensive animal testing. Anticoagulants such as recombinant hirudin, hirulog, argatrobane, and Factor Xa inhibitors, as well as antiplatelet agents on the basis of monoclonal antibody 7E3 offer promise as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis or to invasive intracoronary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.