Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7948227›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics1994

Analysis, classification, and coding of multielectrode spike trains with hidden Markov models.

G Radons, J D Becker, B Dülfer, J Krüger

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Pain.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Itinerancy between attractor states in neural systems.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dynamic alignment models for neural coding.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural dynamics of choice: single-trial analysis of decision-related activity in parietal cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G RadonsInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Kiel, Germany.
J D Becker
B Dülfer
J Krüger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is shown that hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a powerful tool in the analysis of multielectrode data. This is demonstrated for a 30-electrode measurement of neuronal spike activity in the monkey's visual cortex during the application of different visual stimuli. HMMs with optimized parameters code the information contained in the spatiotemporal discharge patterns as a probabilistic function of a Markov process and thus provide abstract dynamical models of the pattern-generating process. We compare HMMs obtained from vector-quantized data with models in which parametrized output processes such as multivariate Poisson or binomial distributions are assumed. In the latter cases the visual stimuli are recognized at rates of more than 90% from the neuronal spike patterns. An analysis of the models obtained reveals important aspects of the coding of information in the brain. For example, we identify relevant time scales and characterize the degree and nature of the spatiotemporal variations on these scales.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCyberneticsEvoked Potentials, VisualHaplorhiniLinear ModelsMarkov ChainsMicroelectrodesPhotic StimulationPoisson DistributionVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID7948227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.