Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7938164›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews1994

Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors.

B B Fredholm, M P Abbracchio, G Burnstock, J W Daly, T K Harden, K A Jacobson, P Leff, M Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 338 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Subtype-specific structural features of the hearing loss-associated human P2X2 receptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Receptors on Microglia.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Glutathione-Mediated Neuroprotective Effect of Purine Derivatives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Physiologic roles of P2 receptors in leukocytes.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B B FredholmDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M P Abbracchio
G Burnstock
J W Daly
T K Harden
K A Jacobson
P Leff
M Williams

Funding

Drugs that Act at Adenosine ReceptorsZ01DK031117 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JACOBSON, KENNETH ALAN · 1991 to 2008
$854k
PROSTHETIC GROUPS FOR RADIOLABELING OF FUNCTIONALIZED DRUGS AND PEPTIDESZ01DK031116 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JACOBSON, KENNETH ALAN · 1991 to 2008
$769k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031116Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031117Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCloning, MolecularHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPurinergic P1 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P1Receptors, Purinergic P2Sequence Homology, Amino AcidLigandsPurinergic P1 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AgonistsPurinergic P2 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P1Receptors, Purinergic P2

Identifiers

PMID7938164
PMCPMC4976594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.