ArticleLangenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie1994
[Splenectomy--a strictly aseptic intervention?].
Article in Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevention of early infective complications after laparoscopic splenectomy with the Garamycin sponge.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the factors causing wound infections after splenectomy, 211 patients undergoing surgery during 1982-1991 were studied in two groups:--Patients with clean-contaminated or contaminated operations with additional splenectomy in the same session;--Patients with elective splenectomy only. While in the first group the rate of disorders of wound healing (DWH) was 31.6%, the second group had a rate of 8.15%. This rate was higher than for other clean operations in our hospital and was as high as for clean-contaminated operations such as cholecystectomy. Among the patients older than 60 years, 38.2% had DWH, as against 8.9% of the patients younger than 60 years. The mean operating time in patients with wound infections was 223 min, while the mean operating time in patients without infections was 125 min. In patients with wound infections the gamma-GT was higher than in patients who had no infection. After these results we have given 2 g ceftriaxon as single-shot prophylaxis before every splenectomy. Since starting this, we have performed 28 splenectomies, and DWH has been observed in only 1 (3.57%). We therefore recommend antibiotic prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7934582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.