Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7928404›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1994

Glycoconjugates of the normal human colorectum: a lectin histochemical study.

R F McMahon, M J Panesar, R W Stoddart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F McMahonDepartment of Pathological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
M J Panesar
R W Stoddart
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies of the normal human colorectum by lectin histochemistry have used a mixture of tissues, including those derived from colons harbouring neoplasia and inflammatory bowel diseases. In the current investigation, tissues from patients without either of these conditions have been examined with a wide panel of lectins, encompassing specificities directed against both N- and O-linked sequences, using an avidin peroxidase revealing system and evaluated with a semiquantitative scoring method. The results of binding of these lectins have been compared with those seen in the resection margins of (at least 5 cm away from) colorectal carcinomas. Consistent regional variations were noted between right- and left-sided colonic tissues, with more diverse glycan structures and a greater sialyl content in the distal colon. There was evidence of graduation of formation of oligosaccharide chains in developing crypts, possibly related to the maturation and expression of glycosyl transferases responsible for the incorporation of mannose residues of N-linked oligosaccharides and of N-acetylgalactosamine and N-acetylglucosamine. Comparison with previous reports has revealed some variations, possibly related to tissue fixation and processing and to lectin concentrations employed, which raises the question of standardization of methodologies in lectin histochemical investigations.

Indexed as

LectinsPlant LectinsColonColorectal NeoplasmsGlycoconjugatesHistocytochemistryHumansPhytohemagglutininsRectumRibosome Inactivating ProteinsTissue Fixationerythrina lectinGlycoconjugatesLectinsleukoagglutinins, plantsLimax flavus agglutininPhytohemagglutininsPlant LectinsRibosome Inactivating ProteinsSambucus nigra lectinsVicia lectins

Identifiers

PMID7928404
OpenAlexW1980628680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.