ArticleHealth services research1994
Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.
Article in Health services research, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe present a Monte Carlo technique to evaluate if observed mortality rates differ from model-predicted rates for situations when the number of deaths is small. DATA SOURCES: We used Medicare hospital claims and model-predicted mortality rates from the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) for the 169 acute care hospitals in Georgia. The HCFA data provided model-predicted mortality rates at 30 days postadmission for 17 conditions and procedures of interest. The model-predicted rates calculated by HCFA were adjusted for patient factors, including demographic characteristics, principal diagnosis, and comorbidities. STUDY
designWe test the hypothesis that model-predicted 30-day mortality rates at the 169 hospitals differ significantly from the observed 30-day mortality rates. Our approach uses a test statistic that resembles a chi-square statistic, and Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis of no differences between the observed and predicted rates. We illustrate the method using two conceptually similar simulation models. We use results of the simulations to estimate p-values and compare these results with p-values associated with the nominal chi-square distribution. DATA EXTRACTION
methodsWe extracted 30-day observed and predicted mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries for federal fiscal year 1990 for 17 conditions and procedures of interest. PRINCIPAL
findingsIf the number of deaths in some hospitals is small, p-values calculated using the nominal chi-square distribution can be misleading, thus supporting the usefulness of our simulation method.
conclusionsThe Monte Carlo simulation is an appropriate approach to the analysis of hospital mortality or small area analysis for situations in which the number of deaths is small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
7928372PMC1070017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.