Trial reportCalcified tissue international1994
Estimation of the effect of salmon calcitonin in established osteoporosis by biochemical bone markers.
Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) correlates to bone loss and predicts the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy in pre- and post-menopausal non-metastatic breast cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 1998Trial
- A new biochemical marker of bone resorption for follow-up on treatment with nasal salmon calcitonin.Calcified tissue international · 1996Trial
- Revisiting Intranasal Salmon Calcitonin: Historical Osteoporosis Evidence and a Potential Role in Acute Orthopaedic Pain Management.JBJS reviews · 2026Review
- Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis.Rheumatology international · 2011Review
- Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women.Arthritis research & therapy · 2009Review
- Osteoporosis, schizophrenia and antipsychotics: the need for a comprehensive multifactorial evaluation.CNS drugs · 2007Review
- Biochemical markers of bone turnover part II: clinical applications in the management of osteoporosis.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2006Article
- Clinical utility of bone markers in the evaluation and follow-up of osteoporotic patients: why are the markers poorly accepted by clinicians?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2003Review
- Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in the assessment of osteoporosis: useful or not?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2003Review
- Intranasal salcatonin (salmon calcitonin). A review of its pharmacological properties and role in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Drugs & aging · 1996Review
- Nasal salmon calcitonin in osteoporosis.Calcified tissue international · 1994Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We reviewed data on 42 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis (forearm fracture or a low bone mass) who had been randomly treated for 1 year with either rectal salmon calcitonin (sCT), 100 IU daily (n = 25) or nasal sCT, 200 IU daily (n = 17) applying an estimation algorithm for bone loss rates. Both groups received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg. A group of 18 age-matched women who received no treatment served as controls. The bone mineral content of the distal forearm (BMCarm) was measured every 3 months by single photon absorptiometry. The individual rates of change during the 1-year period were calculated by linear regression analysis (alpha BMCarm). Bone loss rates were estimated initially and after 1 year of therapy by measurements of serum alkaline phosphatase, plasma bone Gla protein, and fasting urinary hydroxyproline and calcium (both corrected for creatinine excretion) according to the estimation algorithm. Both administration forms revealed significant control group-corrected decreases in serum and urine markers of bone turnover of 15-40% (P < 0.05-0.01) and positive outcomes of 2% in alpha BMCarm (P < 0.01). The estimated effect on bone mass was expressed as the difference between the bone loss estimated after 1 year and initially (delta ESTBIO). A significant correlation was seen between alpha BMCarm and delta ESTBIO (r = 0.5, P < 0.0001). We conclude that the effect of sCT on bone can be followed up by biochemical markers for bone turnover, i.e., by an annual blood and fasting urine sample, applying an estimation algorithm for the rate of bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.