Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7922794›Full record

Trial reportCalcified tissue international1994

Estimation of the effect of salmon calcitonin in established osteoporosis by biochemical bone markers.

N M Nielsen, P von der Recke, M A Hansen, K Overgaard, C Christiansen

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis.Rheumatology international · 2011
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nasal salmon calcitonin in osteoporosis.Calcified tissue international · 1994
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N M NielsenCenter for Clinical & Basic Research, Ballerup, Denmark.
P von der Recke
M A Hansen
K Overgaard
C Christiansen
Center for Clinical & Basic Research · DKGlostrup Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed data on 42 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis (forearm fracture or a low bone mass) who had been randomly treated for 1 year with either rectal salmon calcitonin (sCT), 100 IU daily (n = 25) or nasal sCT, 200 IU daily (n = 17) applying an estimation algorithm for bone loss rates. Both groups received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg. A group of 18 age-matched women who received no treatment served as controls. The bone mineral content of the distal forearm (BMCarm) was measured every 3 months by single photon absorptiometry. The individual rates of change during the 1-year period were calculated by linear regression analysis (alpha BMCarm). Bone loss rates were estimated initially and after 1 year of therapy by measurements of serum alkaline phosphatase, plasma bone Gla protein, and fasting urinary hydroxyproline and calcium (both corrected for creatinine excretion) according to the estimation algorithm. Both administration forms revealed significant control group-corrected decreases in serum and urine markers of bone turnover of 15-40% (P < 0.05-0.01) and positive outcomes of 2% in alpha BMCarm (P < 0.01). The estimated effect on bone mass was expressed as the difference between the bone loss estimated after 1 year and initially (delta ESTBIO). A significant correlation was seen between alpha BMCarm and delta ESTBIO (r = 0.5, P < 0.0001). We conclude that the effect of sCT on bone can be followed up by biochemical markers for bone turnover, i.e., by an annual blood and fasting urine sample, applying an estimation algorithm for the rate of bone loss.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, RectalBiomarkersBone and BonesBone DensityCalcitoninDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForearmHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersCalcitoninsalmon calcitonin

Identifiers

PMID7922794
OpenAlexW1992630502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.