Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7920254›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society1994

Unexpected sequence similarity between nucleosidases and phosphoribosyltransferases of different specificity.

A R Mushegian, E V Koonin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Three monophyletic superfamilies account for the majority of the known glycosyltransferases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2003
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of gene duplication in the evolution of purine nucleotide salvage pathways.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 1998
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A R MushegianDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0091.
E V Koonin
National Center for Biotechnology Information · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amino acid sequences of enzymes that catalyze hydrolysis or phosphorolysis of the N-glycosidic bond in nucleosides and nucleotides (nucleosidases and phosphoribosyltransferases) were explored using computer methods for database similarity search and multiple alignment. Two new families, each including bacterial and eukaryotic enzymes, were identified. Family I consists of Escherichia coli AMP hydrolase (Amn), uridine phosphorylase (Udp), purine phosphorylase (DeoD), uncharacterized proteins from E. coli and Bacteroides uniformis, and, unexpectedly, a group of plant stress-inducible proteins. It is hypothesized that these plant proteins have evolved from nucleosidases and may possess nucleosidase activity. The proteins in this new family contain 3 conserved motifs, one of which was found also in eukaryotic purine nucleosidases, where it corresponds to the nucleoside-binding site. Family II is comprised of bacterial and eukaryotic thymidine phosphorylases and anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferases, the relationship between which has not been suspected previously. Based on the known tertiary structure of E. coli thymidine phosphorylase, structural interpretation was given to the sequence conservation in this family. The highest conservation is observed in the N-terminal alpha-helical domain, whose exact function is not known. Parts of the conserved active site of thymidine phosphorylases and anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferases were delineated. A motif in the putative phosphate-binding site is conserved in family II and in other phosphoribosyltransferases. Our analysis suggests that certain enzymes of very similar specificity, e.g., uridine and thymidine phosphorylases, could have evolved independently. In contrast, enzymes catalyzing such different reactions as AMP hydrolysis and uridine phosphorolysis or thymidine phosphorolysis and phosphoribosyl anthranilate synthesis are likely to have evolved from common ancestors.

Indexed as

Sequence HomologyAmino Acid SequenceAnthranilate PhosphoribosyltransferaseEscherichia coliHumansMolecular Sequence DataN-Glycosyl HydrolasesPentosyltransferasesPlantsPurine-Nucleoside PhosphorylaseSequence AlignmentSubstrate SpecificityThymidine PhosphorylaseTreponema pallidumUridine PhosphorylaseAnthranilate PhosphoribosyltransferaseN-Glycosyl HydrolasesPentosyltransferasesPurine-Nucleoside PhosphorylaseThymidine PhosphorylaseUridine Phosphorylase

Identifiers

PMID7920254
PMCPMC2142895
OpenAlexW2146151607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.