The P1 cloning system: past and future.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cre recombinase mediated alterations of the mouse genome using embryonic stem cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2008
   Review
2. Genetic localization of a Drosophila melanogaster resistance gene to a parasitoid wasp and physical mapping of the region.Genome research · 1999
   Article
3. Modification of bacterial artificial chromosome clones using Cre recombinase: introduction of selectable markers for expression in eukaryotic cells.Genome research · 1998
   Article
4. Isolating large nested deletions in bacterial and P1 artificial chromosomes by in vivo P1 packaging of products of Cre-catalysed recombination between the endogenous and a transposed loxP site.Nucleic acids research · 1997
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as