ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1994
Acute myocardial infarction in women: survival analysis in first six months.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00430612 (The PACE-MI Registry Study - Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The PACE-MI Registry Study - Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction (OBTAIN)
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- "Eve is not Adam" - differences in efficacy, safety and clinical outcomes with lipoprotein apheresis between sexes.Endocrine · 2024Article
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction as a First Event.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Article
- Gender Differences among Elderly Patients with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Aging and disease · 2018Article
- Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2009Article
- Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment.Journal of general internal medicine · 2007Article
- Gender differences in clinical status at time of coronary revascularisation in Spain.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2002Article
- Incidence, recurrence, and case fatality rates for myocardial infarction in southwestern France, 1985 to 1993.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2000Article
- Is aspirin underused in myocardial infarction?PharmacoEconomics · 1997Review
- Article
- Sex related differences in short and long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction: 10 year follow up of 3073 patients in database of first Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996Article
- Selection factors for the use of thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: a population based study of current practice in the United Kingdom. The European Secondary Prevention Study Group.British heart journal · 1995Article
- Women and myocardial infarction: agism rather than sexism?British heart journal · 1995Article
- Coronary heart disease in women. Women may be more ill when they reach hospital.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1994Article
- Coronary heart disease in women. Adjustment for age changes results.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1994Article
- Coronary artery disease and women.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the influence that being female has on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction.
designObservational follow up study.
settingLondon district general hospital. PATIENTS: 216 women and 607 men with acute myocardial infarction admitted to a coronary care unit from 1 January 1988 to 31 December 1992.
main outcome measuresAll cause mortality and recurrent ischaemic events in the first six months.
resultsEvent free survival (95% confidence interval) at six months was 63.3% (56.3% to 69.4%) in women and 76.1% (72.4% to 79.4%) in men, P < 0.001. The difference was confined to the first 30 days but thereafter the hazard plots for women and men converged, with reduction of the hazard ratio from 2.36 (1.70 to 3.27) to 0.81 (0.44 to 1.48). Women were older, but their excess risk persisted after adjustment for age, other baseline variables, and indices of severity of infarction (hazard ratio 1.53 (1.09 to 2.15), P = 0.015). Women tended to be treated with thrombolysis less commonly than men but the difference was small. Substantially fewer women than men, however, were discharged taking beta blockers (23.3% v 41.4%, P < 0.001), and although additional adjustment for discharge treatment did not further reduce the point estimate of the hazard ratio (1.84 (0.89-3.83)), the 95% confidence interval was wide and statistical significance was lost.
conclusionsWomen with acute myocardial infarction have a worse prognosis than men but the excess risk is confined to the first 30 days and is only partly explained by age and other baseline variables. The tendency for women to receive less vigorous treatment than men must be remedied before gender can be considered to be an independent determinant of risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.