Interpreting the evidence for an association between the retinoic acid receptor locus and non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in oral tissue development and disease.Journal of dental research · 2010
   Review
2. Expression of Wnt9b and activation of canonical Wnt signaling during midfacial morphogenesis in mice.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Exclusion of candidate genes from a role in cleft lip with or without cleft palate: linkage and association studies.1993

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as