Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7913375›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1994

Differential effects of omega-conotoxin GVIA and tetrodotoxin on vasoconstrictions evoked by electrical stimulation and nicotinic receptor stimulation in canine isolated, perfused splenic arteries.

L M Ren, T Nakane, S Chiba

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M RenDepartment of Pharmacology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
T Nakane
S Chiba
Shinshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The effects of omega-conotoxin GVIA (omega-CgTX) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) on vasoconstrictions induced by acetylcholine (ACh) and nicotine were investigated and compared with those induced by periarterial electrical stimulation in the isolated and perfused canine splenic arteries. 2. ACh and nicotine at doses of 0.01 to 1 mumol constricted the splenic artery, dose-dependently. ACh induced consistent responses, but the vasoconstrictor responses to nicotine became significantly smaller with repeated administration of nicotine. 3. Periarterial electrical stimulation produced a vasoconstriction that was abolished by either TTX (30 nmol) or omega-CgTX (3 nmol), but the vasoconstrictor response to nicotine was not significantly affected by the same doses of TTX and omega-CgTX. Inhibitions by TTX and omega-CgTX of ACh-induced vasoconstrictions were small but statistically significant, showing that the percentage inhibition was less than 15%. TTX and omega-CgTX did not affect the vasoconstrictor responses to exogenous noradrenaline (NA). 4. ACh did not produce any vasoconstriction in the preparations treated either with alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists (10 microM bunazosin and 10 microM midaglizole) or with 30 microM guanethidine. NA-induced responses were abolished by alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists, but not affected by guanethidine treatment. 5. Vascular responses to ACh were completely inhibited by 1 mumol hexamethonium. In the preparations treated with 100 nmol nicotine, ACh did not produce any vasoconstriction. However, the NA-induced vasoconstriction was affected by neither hexamethonium nor nicotine treatment. 6. Atropine (1 microM) significantly inhibited but did not abolish the vasoconstrictor responses to ACh. The vascular responses to nicotine and NA were also significantly inhibited by atropine treatment. 7. These results indicate that (1) ACh constricts the splenic artery through the activation of presynaptic nicotinic receptors present on the sympathetic nerves; (2) differential effects of TTX and omega-CgTX on the vascular responses to ACh and nicotine, and to electrical stimulation suggest that the receptor-operated ion channels are mainly responsible for NA release induced by nicotinic receptor stimulation, but N-type VOCCs are responsible for that by electrical stimulation; (3) atropine may have an inhibitory action on nicotine-related responses, in addition to its inhibitory action on NA.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAnimalsCalcium Channel BlockersDogsElectric StimulationFemaleGuanethidineHexamethoniumHexamethonium CompoundsMaleNicotineomega-Conotoxin GVIAPeptidesPerfusionReceptors, NicotinicAcetylcholineAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsCalcium Channel BlockersGuanethidineHexamethoniumHexamethonium CompoundsNicotineomega-Conotoxin GVIAPeptidesReceptors, NicotinicTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID7913375
PMCPMC1910132
OpenAlexW2064914642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.