Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7908218›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1994

Allelic loss on distal chromosome 17p is associated with poor prognosis in a group of Brazilian breast cancer patients.

M A Nagai, M M Pacheco, M M Brentani, L A Marques, R R Brentani, B A Ponder, L M Mulligan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M A NagaiFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
M M Pacheco
M M Brentani
L A Marques
R R Brentani
B A Ponder
L M Mulligan
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for two loci on chromosome 17p (D17S5 and TP53), and erbB-2 gene amplification, in primary breast cancers from 67 Brazilian patients. We identified two distinct regions of LOH on chromosome 17p, one spanning TP53 and the other a more telomeric region (D17S5). Based on a short-term follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analyses of patients' disease-free survival showed that patients with LOH for D17S5, but retaining heterozygosity for TP53, were at higher risk of recurrence (P = 0.007) than those who retained heterozygosity for D17S5. Bivariate analyses indicated that patients with LOH for D17S5 alone had an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 7.2) over patients with erbB-2 amplification (hazard ratio = 3.7), when compared with patients with neither alteration (hazard ratio = 1.0). Further, lymph node-positive patients whose tumours had both LOH for D17S5 and erbB-2 gene amplification had a higher risk of recurrence than patients whose tumours had neither of these genetic alterations. Our data confirm previous reports of a putative tumour-suppressor gene, distinct from TP53, on distal chromosome 17p which is associated with breast cancer. They further suggest that LOH for loci in this region may provide an independent indicator to identify patients with poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17Gene DeletionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllelesBrazilBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCarcinoma, MedullaryDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene AmplificationDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID7908218
PMCPMC1968822
OpenAlexW2073153039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.