Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7901119›Full record

ArticleGenetics1993

The distribution and spreading of rare variants in the histone multigene family of Drosophila melanogaster.

C Colby, S M Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C ColbyDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Massachusetts 02215.
S M Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We surveyed the distribution of rare variant restriction sites within and among histone gene arrays of Drosophila melanogaster using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Seventy-three naturally occurring arrays were digested with restriction enzymes that had no recognition sites in the published histone sequence. Of the arrays surveyed, 68.5% had at least two nonconsensus restriction sites present as indicated by the presence of a small band or bands on the autoradiographs. These bands were almost always the length of a single repeat in the histone multigene family or a multiple of this length. In arrays with more than one band, intensity of the bands almost always decreased with increasing size. This shows that within these arrays variant restriction sites were predominantly located on adjacent repeats. If these bands are caused by spreading of variant sites, as is most likely, then variants spread along the array as an inverse function of distance. Overall, if a sequence spread it had a 92% probability of ending up in its nearest neighbor. This pattern may result from the noncontiguous nature of the histone family.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADrosophila melanogasterHistonesMultigene FamilyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthDNAHistones

Identifiers

PMID7901119
PMCPMC1205612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.