ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1994
Voltage- and time-dependent inhibitory effects on rat aortic and porcine coronary artery contraction induced by propafenone and quinidine.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereoselective effects of the enantiomers, quinidine and quinine, on depolarization- and agonist-mediated responses in rat isolated aorta.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g. Na+ channel blockers) such as propafenone and quinidine also inhibit voltage-gated Ca2+ and K+ channels. In the present paper the voltage- and time-dependent inhibitory effects of propafenone and quinidine were studied on depolarization-induced vascular contractions and 45Ca2+ uptake in isolated endothelium denuded rat aorta and pig left descending coronary artery. 2. Quinidine and propafenone (10(-7) M -5 x 10(-5) M) produced a concentration-dependent relaxation of the contractions induced by 80 mM KCl. Propafenone was significantly more potent (P < 0.05) than quinidine in both rat aorta and pig coronary arteries but both drugs more potent (P < 0.05) in relaxing rat aorta than pig coronary arteries. In rat aortic rings, the relaxant effects of propafenone were unaffected by pretreatment with the Na+ channel blocker, tetrodotoxin. 3. The degree of inhibition produced after prolonged exposure (40 min) to propafenone and quinidine differed as the time of depolarization with 80 mM KCl was increased. Quinidine (3 x 10(-6) M, 10(-5) M and 3 x 10(-5) M) not only produced an inhibition at the very early stage of contraction, but also a time-dependent inhibition was observed. In contrast, propafenone (10(-6) M, 3 x 10(-6) M and 10(-5) M) produced a more marked concentration-dependent early block but only a mild time-dependent inhibition.4. The voltage-dependence of propafenone- and quinidine-induced inhibition, was studied in rat aorta and coronary arteries which had been incubated in 5 or 40mM KCl Ca2+-free solution and then contracted by changing the bath solution to 100 mM KCI and 2 mM CaCl2 solution. The inhibitor effects of quinidine were significantly enhanced (P <0.05) when the preparations were preincubated in 40 mMKCl (depolarizing) solution. In contrast, the effects of propafenone were quite similar in 5 or in 40 mMKCI solution.5. Quinidine, 10-5 M, produced a greater inhibition (P<0.05) of 100 mM KCl-stimulated 45Ca2+ uptake in aortic rings preincubated in depolarizing as compared to normal solution. In contrast, the inhibition produced by 3 x 10-6 M propafenone was similar in aortic rings incubated in 5 or 40 mM KCl solution.6.It is concluded that both quinidine and propafenone inhibited vascular smooth muscle contraction which could be attributed to reduced Ca2+ entry. The voltage- and time-dependent inhibitory effects of quinidine may reflect an increased binding of the drug to Ca2+ channels at depolarized potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.