Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7889021›Full record

ReviewPharmacy world & science : PWS1994

Pharmacotherapy of congestive heart failure. Currently used and experimental drugs.

P A van Zwieten

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A van ZwietenDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A survey is given of the currently used therapeutics in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. Symptomatic treatment is usually performed along the following lines: rest, sodium and fluid restriction to unload the decompensating heart, loop diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or other vasodilators; inotropic agents to improve the heart's mechanical performance; attempts to counteract the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms, that is the activated sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems, as well as the rise in vasopressine levels. New insights have been obtained in the effects of cardiac glycosides, which are probably rather based on counteracting the elevated sympathetic neuronal activity than on their weak and uncertain inotropic action. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are probably more effective than classical vasodilators owing to their additional interaction with the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms. Ibopamine, a prodrug of epinine, appears to be rather a vasodilator and antagonist of the neuro-endocrine compensatory mechanisms than an inotropic agent. The most important clinical trials addressing the efficacy and adverse reactions to the various aforementioned therapeutics are discussed. New, experimental approaches in the drug treatment of chronic congestive heart failure include beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, vasopressin antagonists and inhibitors of atrial natriuretic peptide degradation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHeart FailureHumans

Identifiers

PMID7889021
OpenAlexW2330214925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.