Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7883961›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation1995

Role of the low density lipoprotein receptor in the flux of cholesterol through the plasma and across the tissues of the mouse.

Y Osono, L A Woollett, J Herz, J M Dietschy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Regulatory Effect of SIRT1 on Extracellular Microenvironment Remodeling.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y OsonoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235.
L A Woollett
J Herz
J M Dietschy
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF LDL RECEPTOR PROMOTERP01HL020948 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOLDSTEIN, JOSEPH L · 1985 to 2021
$103.1M
Disordered Cellular Cholesterol Movement, Cell Death, and Multisystem DiseaseR01HL009610 · NHLBI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TURLEY, STEPHEN DEAN · 1985 to 2013
$7.5M
CONTROL OF CHOLESTEROL METABOLISM--BILE ACID TRANSPORTR37HL009610 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI DIETSCHY, JOHN M. · 1995 to 2004
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-09610NHLBI NIH HHS HL-20948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These studies were undertaken to quantify cholesterol balance across the plasma space and the individual organs of the mouse, and to determine the role of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) in these two processes. In the normal mouse (129 Sv), sterol was synthesized at the rate of 153 mg/d per kg body weight of which 78% occurred in the extrahepatic tissues while only 22% took place in the liver. These animals metabolized 7.1 pools of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) per day, and 79% of this degradation took place in the liver. Of this total turnover, the LDLR accounted for 88% while the remaining 12% was receptor independent. 91% of the receptor-dependent transport identified in these animals was located in the liver while only 38% of the receptor-independent uptake wsa found in this organ. When the LDLR was deleted, the LDL-C production rate increased 1.7-fold, LDL-C turnover decreased from 7.1 to 0.88 pools/d, and the plasma LDL-C level increased 14-fold, from 7 to 101 mg/dl. Despite these major changes in the circulating levels of LDL-C, however, there was no change in the rate of cholesterol synthesis in any extrahepatic organ or in the whole animal, and, further, there was no change in the steady-state cholesterol concentration in any organ. Thus, most extrahepatic tissues synthesize their daily sterol requirements while most LDL-C is returned directly to the liver. Changes in LDLR activity, therefore, profoundly alter the plasma LDL-C concentration but have virtually no affect on cholesterol balance across any extrahepatic organ, including the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCholesterolFemaleIsotope LabelingLipoproteins, LDLLiverMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiceMice, Mutant StrainsModels, BiologicalReceptors, LDLSex CharacteristicsTissue DistributionCholesterolLipoproteins, LDLReceptors, LDL

Identifiers

PMID7883961
PMCPMC441449
OpenAlexW2092054388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.