Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7881736›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1995

Dotarizine versus flunarizine as calcium antagonists in chromaffin cells.

M Villarroya, L Gandía, B Lara, A Albillos, M G López, A G García

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M VillarroyaDepartmento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
L Gandía
B Lara
A Albillos
M G López
A G García
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Dotarizine is a novel piperazine derivative structurally related to flunarizine that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for its antimigraine and antivertigo effects. This clinical profile may be related to its Ca2+ antagonist properties. Therefore, the actions of both compounds as calcium antagonists were compared in bovine chromaffin cells. 2. Dotarizine and flunarizine blocked 45Ca2+ uptake into K+ depolarized chromaffin cells (70 mM K+/0.5 mM Ca2+ for 60 s) in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50s of 4.8 and 6.7 microM, respectively. 3. Dotarizine and flunarizine also inhibited the whole-cell Ca2+ and Ba2+ currents (ICa, IBa) in voltage-clamped chromaffin cells, induced by depolarizing test pulses to 0 mV, during 50 ms, from a holding potential of -80 mV. Blockade exhibited IC50s of 4 microM for dotarizine and 2.2 microM for flunarizine. Dotarizine increased the rate of inactivation of ICa and IBa; inhibition of whole-cell currents was use-dependent. 4. Transient increases of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]i, produced by K+ stimulation (70 mM K+ for 5 s) of single fura-2-loaded chromaffin cells, were also inhibited by dotarizine and flunarizine with IC50s of 1.2 and 0.6 microM, respectively. Upon washout of dotarizine, the [Ca2+]i increases recovered fully after 5-10 min. In contrast, the responses remained largely inhibited 10 min after washing out flunarizine. 5. Catecholamine release induced by K+ stimulation (10-s pulses of 70 mM) was inhibited by dotarizine with an IC50 of 2.6 microM and by flunarizine with an IC50 of 1.2 microM. The blocking effects of both compounds developed slowly, and was fully established after 20-30 min of superfusion. While blockade by dotarizine quickly reversed upon its washout, that of flunarizine lasted even 25 min after washing out.6. Catecholamine release from electroporated chromaffin cells triggered by 10 micro M Ca2+ was not affected by 10 micro M dotarizine or flunarizine.7. Overall, the results suggest that dotarizine behaves as a Ca2+ antagonist in bovine chromaffin cells. It exhibits a potency similar to flunarizine in blocking Ca2+ entry, Ca2+ channels, Cai2+ signals and secretion. The dotarizine effects are readily reversible suggesting that in contrast to flunarizine, it does not accumulate in cells. Dotarizine is devoid of intracellular effects on the secretory machinery. All its blocking effects on Ca2+ entry, [Ca2+]i rise and secretion are probably due to blockade of various Ca2+channel subtypes in chromaffin cells. This blockade is use-dependent and seems to be due to the increase by dotarizine of the rate of Ca2+ channel inactivation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBariumBenzhydryl CompoundsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium RadioisotopesCatecholaminesCattleCells, CulturedChromaffin SystemEgtazic AcidFlunarizineFura-2PiperazinesPotassiumBariumBenzhydryl CompoundsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium RadioisotopesCatecholaminesdotarizineEgtazic AcidFlunarizineFura-2PiperazinesPotassium

Identifiers

PMID7881736
PMCPMC1510232
OpenAlexW2004656599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.