Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7881106›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment1994

Metabolism of breast cancer cells as revealed by non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies.

O Kaplan, J S Cohen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

O KaplanDepartment of Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Israel.
J S Cohen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basis for the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy as a tool to study the metabolism of breast cancer cells is described. The differences between proton (1H), carbon (13C), and phosphorus (31P) NMR methods is explained, and the techniques of cell extracts, cell suspensions and perfusion methods for cells are detailed. In order to perfuse cells they are preferably trapped in a gel matrix, either in the form of a thread or a bead. The gel must have appropriate properties that enables efficient oxygenation and availability of nutrients and drugs. The metabolic effects of perfusion of breast cancer cells with nutrients, drugs, and hormones are reported, and the clinical relevance of these results and methods are outlined.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDeoxyglucoseDrug Resistance, MultipleEnergy MetabolismGrowth SubstancesHormonesHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationOrganoidsSpecimen HandlingAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxyglucoseGrowth SubstancesHormones

Identifiers

PMID7881106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.