ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease1994
Secondary surgery after failed postanal or anterior sphincter repair.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary surgery after failed postanal repair or anterior sphincter repair was performed in eight female patients. After failed postanal repair in five patients, anterior sphincter plication and levatorplasty was the secondary procedure. In two patients a defect of the anterior external sphincter was corrected and in two patients an extremely thin external sphincter was augmented. This contributed to an excellent result in three and a good result in one patient. No improvement was achieved in one patient without anterior defect. After failed anterior sphincter repair in three patients, postanal repair was the secondary procedure. A good result was obtained in one patient and failure in two. Secondary surgery failed postanal or anterior sphincter repair may have a good result in the majority of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.