Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7876660›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiac imaging1994

Automated extraction, labelling and analysis of the coronary vasculature from arteriograms.

A C Dumay, J J Gerbrands, J H Reiber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiac imaging, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coronary artery center-line extraction using second order local features.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012
    Article
  2. Automatic stenosis detection and quantification in renal arteriography.Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium · 1997
    Article
  3. What to do with OCA results from multiple angiographic views?International journal of cardiac imaging · 1995
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A C DumayUniversity Hospital Leiden, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands.
J J Gerbrands
J H Reiber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For clinical decision-making and documentation purposes we have developed techniques to extract, label and analyze the coronary vasculature from arteriograms in an automated, quantitative manner. Advanced image processing techniques were applied to extract and analyze the vasculatures from non-subtracted arteriograms while artificial intelligence techniques were employed to assign anatomical labels. Lumen diameters of 11 phantom vessels were assessed with an accuracy of 0.27 +/- 0.19 mm (dtrue = 0.45 + 0.92dmeasured; r > 0.99) and 0.21 +/- 0.15 mm (dtrue = 0.42 + 0.91dmeasured; r > 0.99), from cine and digital images, respectively. We collected a total of 15 routinely acquired cine-arteriograms showing 74 vessel segments with 18 stenoses (severity larger than 30% assessed quantitatively), and 53 digital arteriograms showing 236 vessel segments with 69 stenoses. From the cine arteriograms we extracted 64 (86%) of the vessel segments without manual correction and 196 (83%) from the digital arteriograms. Repeated analysis (3 times) of the arteriograms by the same operator resulted in a standard deviation of the mean segment diameters (precision) of 0.064 mm for the cine-images and 0.020 mm for the digital images, while the standard deviations in the measurement of the minimal luminal diameter of the observed stenoses were 0.020 mm and 0.019 mm, respectively. The LAD artery, the septal and diagonal branches were correctly identified automatically in 86% of the segments. From these evaluations we conclude that our automated approach provides reliable tools for the assessment of multi-vessel disease, both in an off- and on-line environment.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCineangiographyCoronary DiseaseIn Vitro TechniquesModels, Structural

Identifiers

PMID7876660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.