Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7873092›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1994

Drug-induced taste and smell disorders. Incidence, mechanisms and management related primarily to treatment of sensory receptor dysfunction.

R I Henkin

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endocrinology of Taste with Aging.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Salt Taste and Salt Sensitive Hypertension in HIV.Current hypertension reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dietary Quality and Perceived Barriers to Weight Loss among Older Overweight Veterans with Dysmobility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R I HenkinTaste and Smell Clinic, Center for Molecular Nutrition and Sensory Disorders, Washington, DC 20016.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs in every major pharmacological category can impair both taste and smell function and do so more commonly than presently appreciated. Impairment usually affects sensory function at a molecular level, causing 2 major behavioural changes--loss of acuity (i.e. hypogeusia and hyposmia) and/or distortion of function (i.e. dysgeusia and dysosmia). These changes can impair appetite, food intake, cause significant lifestyle changes and may require discontinuation of drug administration. Loss of acuity occurs primarily by drug inactivation of receptor function through inhibition of tastant/odorant receptor: (i) binding; (ii) Gs protein function; (iii) inositol trisphosphate function; (iv) channel (Ca++,Na++) activity; (v) other receptor inhibiting effects; or (vi) some combination of these effects. Distortions occur primarily by a drug inducing abnormal persistence of receptor activity (i.e. normal receptor inactivation does not occur) or through failure to activate: (i) various receptor kinases; (ii) Gi protein function; (iii) cytochrome P450 enzymes; or other effects which usually (iv) turn off receptor function; (v) inactivate tastant/odorant receptor binding; or (vi) some combination of these effects. Termination of drug therapy is commonly associated with termination of taste/smell dysfunction, but occasionally effects persist and require specific therapy to alleviate symptoms. Treatment primarily requires restoration of normal sensory receptor growth, development and/or function. Treatment which restores sensory acuity requires correction of steps initiating receptor and other pathology and includes zinc, theophylline, magnesium and fluoride. Treatment which inhibits sensory distortions requires reactivation of biochemical inhibition at the receptor or inactivation of inappropriate stimulus receptor binding and/or correction of other steps initiating pathology including dopaminergic antagonists, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic agonists, calcium channel blockers and some orally active local anaesthetic, antiarrhythmic drugs.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsCardiovascular AgentsHumansIncidenceOlfaction DisordersSensory Receptor CellsSmellTasteTaste DisordersAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsCardiovascular Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.