Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7864810›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal1995

Interaction of calponin with actin and its functional implications.

J Kołakowski, R Makuch, D Stepkowski, R Dabrowska

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Acid pH Strategy Adaptation throughJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. TwoThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tianma modulates blood vessel tonicity.The open biochemistry journal · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J KołakowskiDepartment of Muscle Biochemistry, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
R Makuch
D Stepkowski
R Dabrowska
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titration of F-actin with calponin causes the formation of two types of complexes. One, at saturation, contains a lower ratio of calponin to actin (0.5:1) and is insoluble at physiological ionic strength. The another is soluble, with a higher ratio of calponin to actin (1:1). Electron microscopy revealed that the former complex consists of paracrystalline bundles of actin filaments, whereas the latter consists of separate filaments. Ca(2+)-calmodulin causes dissociation of bundles with simultaneous increase in the number of separate calponin-containing filaments. Further increase in the calmodulin concentration results in full release of calponin from actin filaments. In motility assays, calponin, when added together with ATP to actin filaments complexed with immobilized myosin, evoked a decrease in both the number and velocity of moving actin filaments. Addition of calponin to actin filaments before their binding to myosin resulted in a formation of actin filament bundles which were dissociated by ATP.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCalciumCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalmodulinCalponinsChickensElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMicrofilament ProteinsMicroscopy, ElectronMyosinsOsmolar ConcentrationRabbitsUltracentrifugationActinsAdenosine TriphosphateCalciumCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalmodulinCalponinsMicrofilament ProteinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID7864810
PMCPMC1136501
OpenAlexW2216604873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.