Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7862134›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1995

Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

C C Adams, J L Workman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Circadian regulation of stereotypic chromatin conformations at enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

C C AdamsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802-4500.
J L Workman
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation in ChromatinR37GM047867 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WORKMAN, JERRY L · 2001 to 2010
$3.4M
MECHANISMS OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION IN CHROMATINR01GM047867 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WORKMAN, JERRY L · 1992 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 47867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBase SequenceBinding SitesChromatinCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliFungal ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, InsertionalNF-kappa BNucleosomesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProtein BindingChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsGAL4 protein, S cerevisiaeNF-kappa BNucleosomesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsUpstream Stimulatory Factors

Identifiers

PMID7862134
PMCPMC230365
OpenAlexW2099061740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.