Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7858202›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology1994

Activation tagging: a means of isolating genes implicated as playing a role in plant growth and development.

R Walden, K Fritze, H Hayashi, E Miklashevichs, H Harling, J Schell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Misexpression Approaches for the Manipulation of Flower Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. BAS1: A gene regulating brassinosteroid levels and light responsiveness in Arabidopsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

R WaldenMax Planck Institut für Zuchtungsforschung, Köln, Germany.
K Fritze
H Hayashi
E Miklashevichs
H Harling
J Schell
Max Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation T-DNA tagging has been used to generate a variety of tobacco cell lines selected by their ability to grow either in the absence of auxin or cytokinin in the culture media, or under selective levels of an inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis. The majority of the cell lines studied in detail contain single T-DNA inserts genetically co-segregating with the selected phenotype. While most of the plants regenerated from the mutant cell lines appear phenotypically normal, several display phenotypes which could be inferred to result from disturbances in the content, or the metabolism, of auxins and cytokinins, or polyamines. The tagging vector is designed to allow the isolation of tagged plant genes by plasmid rescue. Confirmation that the genomic sequence responsible for the selected phenotype has indeed been isolated is provided by PEG-mediated protoplast DNA uptake of rescued plasmids followed by selection for protoplast growth under the original selective conditions. Several plasmids have been rescued from the mutant lines which confer on transfected protoplasts the ability to grow either in the absence of auxin or cytokinin in the culture media, or under selective levels of an inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis. This review describes the background to activation tagging and our progress in characterizing the genes that have been tagged in the mutant lines we have generated.

Indexed as

Plants, ToxicSequence Tagged SitesCytokininsDNA, BacterialGenes, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsMutagenesis, InsertionalNicotianaPlant Growth RegulatorsPolyaminesCytokininsDNA, BacterialIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Growth RegulatorsPolyaminesT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID7858202
OpenAlexW1969059692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.