Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7854253›Full record

ReviewMicrobiological reviews1994

Chloroplast ribosomes and protein synthesis.

E H Harris, J E Boynton, N W Gillham

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiological reviews, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The RiceBiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Erythromycin Treatment ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E H HarrisDCMB Group, Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-1000.
J E Boynton
N W Gillham
Duke University · US

Funding

HEREDITARY CONTROL OF ORGANELLE STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR01GM019427 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOYNTON, JOHN E · 1985 to 1998
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-19427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent with their postulated origin from endosymbiotic cyanobacteria, chloroplasts of plants and algae have ribosomes whose component RNAs and proteins are strikingly similar to those of eubacteria. Comparison of the secondary structures of 16S rRNAs of chloroplasts and bacteria has been particularly useful in identifying highly conserved regions likely to have essential functions. Comparative analysis of ribosomal protein sequences may likewise prove valuable in determining their roles in protein synthesis. This review is concerned primarily with the RNAs and proteins that constitute the chloroplast ribosome, the genes that encode these components, and their expression. It begins with an overview of chloroplast genome structure in land plants and algae and then presents a brief comparison of chloroplast and prokaryotic protein-synthesizing systems and a more detailed analysis of chloroplast rRNAs and ribosomal proteins. A description of the synthesis and assembly of chloroplast ribosomes follows. The review concludes with discussion of whether chloroplast protein synthesis is essential for cell survival.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisBase SequenceChloroplastsEukaryotaMolecular Sequence DataPeptide Chain Elongation, TranslationalPlant ProteinsPlantsRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesRNA, RibosomalPlant ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID7854253
PMCPMC372988
OpenAlexW1950121699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.