Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7846921›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery

Selective decontamination of the colon before elective colorectal surgery. West of Scotland Surgical Infection Study Group.

E W Taylor, G Lindsay

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in gastrointestinal surgery: useful in infection prevention? A systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.Quality in health care : QHC · 1999
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in elective colorectal surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E W TaylorVale of Leven Hospital, Alexandria, Scotland, U.K.
G Lindsay
Southern General Hospital · GBVale of Leven District General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The controversy over the route of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective colorectal operations persists for oral, parenteral, and a combination of the two routes. The oral antibiotics commonly administered for colorectal prophylaxis, neomycin and eythromycin base, are not absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). However, the 4-fluoroquinolones are absorbed in the upper GIT and are excreted in part by the colonic mucosa. Their action is then to remove, or severely depress, the gram-negative aerobic bacilli leaving the anaerobic flora unaffected. This action is the principle of selective decontamination. We have assessed the efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin in a prospective randomized clinical trial in which all patients received piperacillin 4 g i.v. as single-dose parenteral prophylaxis. A group of 327 evaluable patients were randomized to receive ciprofloxacin 500 mg b.i.d. with the preoperative cathartic (group OA, n = 159) or no oral antibiotic (group NOA, n = 168). Postoperative wound infection occurred in 18 (11.3%) patients in group OA and 39 (23.2%) patients in group NOA (chi 2 = 7.2, p = 0.007). Operation-related infection of any type occurred in 23 (14.5%) patients in group OA compared with 55 (32.7%) in group NOA (chi 2 = 14.0, p = 0.0002). The median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (interquartile range 4.5 days) for group OA and 12 days (interquartile range 8 days) for group NOA (Mann Whitney U test, p = 0.005). Ignoring the treatment group, the median postoperative hospital stay was 17 days (interquartile range 10 days) for infected patients and 11 days (interquartile range 4 days) for those not infected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCiprofloxacinColonDecontaminationElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRectumSurgical Wound InfectionCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID7846921
OpenAlexW2412805619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.