Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7838928›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology1994

Mesoaccumbens dopamine-opiate interactions in the control over behaviour by a conditioned reinforcer.

G D Phillips, T W Robbins, B J Everitt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Enhancement of locomotor activity and conditioned reward to cocaine by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G D PhillipsDepartment of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
T W Robbins
B J Everitt
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These experiments examined the role of dopamine-opiate interactions in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens in the mediation of reinforcement-related behaviour. It has been shown previously that opiates induce a dopamine-dependent increase in locomotor activity in rats when infused into the VTA, and a dopamine-independent hyperactivity when infused into the nucleus accumbens. The present study investigated the generality and significance of these two findings, by examining dopamine-opiate interactions in the control over behaviour exerted by a conditioned reinforcer (CR), an arbitrary stimulus which gains control by association with primary reinforcement. Rats were trained to associate a light/noise stimulus with sucrose reinforcement, and the efficacy of the CR in controlling behaviour was assessed by measuring its ability to support a new lever pressing response. Responding on one lever (CR lever) produced the CR, responding on the other lever had no programmed consequences. In experiment 1, intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine (10 micrograms), the D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF-38393 (0.1 microgram), the D2 dopamine receptor agonist LY-171555 (quinpirole; 0.1 microgram) or the opiate receptor agonist [D-Ala2]-methionine enkephalinamide (DALA; 1 microgram) selectively increased responding on the CR lever. Infusion with DALA intra-VTA had no effect. However, pretreatment with DALA intra-VTA (10 x 1 microgram/day) subsequently reduced the selectivity of the response to infusions intra-accumbens with d-amphetamine or SKF-38393, and blocked the response to LY-171555 or DALA. Pretreatment also shifted to the right the dose-response function for DALA intra-accumbens. In experiment 2, intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine, SKF-38393, LY-171555 or DALA again increased responding on the CR lever only. Pretreatment with intra-accumbens d-amphetamine (5 x 1 microgram/day) reduced the selectivity of the response subsequently to d-amphetamine, and blocked the response to SKF-38393, LY-171555 or DALA. In experiment 3, intra-accumbens infusions of the mu-opiate receptor agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (0.003-0.1 microgram), or the delta-opiate receptor agonist [D-Pen2,5]-enkephalin (0.03-1 microgram) enhanced selectively responding on the CR lever. Thus, the dopamine-dependent locomotor-stimulant properties of intra-VTA infusions of opiates are associated with impaired conditioned reinforcer efficacy. Finally, repeated stimulation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway may compromise the dopamine-independence of the opiate system within the nucleus accumbens.

Indexed as

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineAnalgesicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantDextroamphetamineDopamine AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-Enkephalin, MethionineEnkephalinsErgolinesInjectionsMaleNucleus Accumbens2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineAnalgesicsDextroamphetamineDopamine AgonistsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-enkephalinamide-Met, Ala(2)-Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-Enkephalin, MethionineEnkephalinsErgolinesQuinpiroleReceptors, DopamineReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID7838928
OpenAlexW2025421654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.