Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7834963›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics1994

Clinical pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel.

D S Sonnichsen, M V Relling

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D S SonnichsenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis Tennessee.
M V Relling
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

P450 METABOLISM OF EPIPODOPHYLLOTOXINS IN CHILDRENR01CA051001 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI RELLING, MARY V. · 1996 to 2006
$2.7M
PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP PARTICIPATIONU10CA031566 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI PUI, CHING-HON · 1985 to 2002
$668k
TREATMENT OF RELAPSEP01CA020180 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI LOOK, A THOMAS · 1985 to 1997
–
POLYMORPHIC METABOLISM OF ANTINEOPLASTICS IN CHILDRENR29CA051001 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI RELLING, MARY V. · 1990 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 20180NCI NIH HHS CA 31566NCI NIH HHS CA 51001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent showing significant promise as therapy for solid tumours and leukaemia, given alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Paclitaxel concentrations in biological specimens can be measured using high performance liquid chromatography, or more recently by immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic studies in which adults have been administered pacliaxel intravenously over 1 to 96 hours have demonstrated the following pharmacokinetic characteristics: extensive tissue distribution; high plasma protein binding (approximately 90 to 95%); variable systemic clearance, with average clearances ranging from 87 to 503 ml/min/m2 (5.2 to 30.2 L/h/m2); and minimal renal excretion of parent drug (< 10%). In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that paclitaxel is extensively metabolised by the liver to 3 primary metabolites. Cytochrome P450 enzymes of the CYP3A and CYP2C subfamilies appear to be involved in hepatic metabolism of paclitaxel. Although early reports suggested that paclitaxel has first-order pharmacokinetics, some recent trials in children and adults suggest that its elimination is saturable. The clinical importance of saturable elimination would be greatest when large dosages are administered and/or the drug is infused over a shorter period of time. In these situations, achievable plasma concentrations are likely to exceed the affinity constant for elimination (Km). Thus, small changes in dosage or infusion duration may result in disproportionately large alterations in paclitaxel systemic exposure, potentially influencing patient response. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel has demonstrated that paclitaxel clearance is apparently sequence dependent. Patients administered cisplatin prior to paclitaxel had lower clearances and greater clinical toxicity than patients receiving paclitaxel before cisplatin. Additional pharmacodynamic analyses have shown nonhaematological and haematological toxicity to correlate better with parameters of paclitaxel exposure (e.g. area under the plasma concentration-time curve, duration of plasma concentrations exceeding 0.1 mumol/L) than with the administered dosage.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAdultBlood ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDosage FormsDrug Administration RoutesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansImmunoassayPaclitaxelProtein BindingTissue DistributionBlood ProteinsDosage FormsPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID7834963
OpenAlexW2002015295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.