ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1994
Mediation by SRIF1 receptors of the contractile action of somatostatin in rat isolated distal colon; studies using some novel SRIF analogues.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomics: Fundamentals, Methods, Analysis, Limits, and Recommendations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic advances in functional gastrointestinal disease: irritable bowel syndrome.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2009Article
- Somatostatin sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of parietal cell function in rat isolated gastric mucosa.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Differences in the operational characteristics of the human recombinant somatostatin receptor types, sst1 and sst2, in mouse fibroblast (Ltk-) cells.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Localization and pharmacological characterization of somatostatin sst2 sites in the rat cerebellum.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Somatostatin receptors mediating inhibition of basal and stimulated electrogenic ion transport in rat isolated distal colonic mucosa.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Further evidence from functional studies for somatostatin receptor heterogeneity in guinea-pig isolated ileum, vas deferens and right atrium.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The motor effects of somatostatin-14 (SRIF), and several SRIF peptide analogues were investigated on the rat isolated distal colon. The objective of these studies was to characterize the receptor mediating the contractile action of SRIF by comparing the relative agonist potencies of a range of SRIF analogues. 2. SRIF (1 nM-1 microM) produced concentration-dependent contractions with an EC50 value of approximately 10 nM. Contractile responses induced by SRIF were insensitive to atropine (1 microM) or naloxone (1 microM) but abolished by tetrodotoxin (1 microM). Somatostatin-28 (SRIF28), also induced concentration-dependent contractions and was equipotent with SRIF. Phosphoramidon (1 microM) and amastatin (10 microM) did not increase the potency of either SRIF or SRIF28. 3. The SRIF peptide analogues, octreotide, SRIF25, seglitide, angiopeptin and CGP23996 (1 nM-1 microM) produced contractile responses in the rat distal colon, each having similar potency and maximal activity relative to SRIF. The SSTR2 receptor-selective hexapeptide, BIM23027 (0.1 nM-1 microM), and the SRIF stereoisomer, D-Trp8-SRIF (0.1 nM-1 microM), were the most potent agonists examined being approximately 12 and 7 times more potent than SRIF, respectively. In contrast, the SSTR5 receptor-selective analogue, L362,855, was approximately 120 times weaker than SRIF, whilst the SSTR3 receptor-selective analogue, BIM23056, was inactive at concentrations up to 3 microM. 4. The putative SRIF receptor antagonist, (cyclo(7-aminoheptanoyl Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr[Bzl]))(CPP) (1 microM), had no agonist activity and had no effect on contractions induced by SRIF. 5. The contractile actions of BIM23027 and seglitide were subject to pronounced desensitization. Desensitization of preparations by BIM23027 (0.3 JIM) abolished the contractile action of SRIF andSRIF28 but had no effect on contractions produced by acetylcholine (0.1 nM-I1M), suggesting thatBIM23027, SRIF and SRIF28 act via a common receptor mechanism.6. In conclusion, the rat isolated distal colon contracts in response to SRIF and a number of SRIF analogues. Seglitide and octreotide exhibited similar potency and maximal activity relative to SRIF,suggesting that in the rat colon the receptor mediating contraction belongs to the SRIF,-receptor group,of which the recombinant SSTR2, SSTR3 and SSTR5 receptors appear to be subtypes. The high potency of BIM23027, the weak agonist activity of L362,855 and the lack of activity exhibited by BIM23056suggests that the SRIF receptor mediating contraction in the rat distal colon is similar to there combinant SSTR2 receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.