Evidence based policymaking.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Suicide mortality rates in Japan before and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic era.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024
   Review
2. Organisational capacity and its relationship to research use in six Australian health policy agencies.PloS one · 2018
   Article
3. Development of a framework to improve the utilisation of malaria research for policy development in Malawi.Health research policy and systems · 2017
   Article
4. The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy.Health research policy and systems · 2016
   Article
5. Bridging evidence, policy, and practice to strengthen health systems for improved maternal and newborn health in Pakistan.Health research policy and systems · 2015
   Article
6. Evidence-based medicine: is it a bridge too far?Health research policy and systems · 2015
   Article
7. Using conjoint analysis to develop a system to score research engagement actions by health decision makers.Health research policy and systems · 2015
   Article
8. Usage of an online tool to help policymakers better engage with research: Web CIPHER.Implementation science : IS · 2015
   Article
9. The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research.Systematic reviews · 2014
   Article
10. How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study.Implementation science : IS · 2013
    Article
11. Applying a Health Network approach to translate evidence-informed policy into practice: a review and case study on musculoskeletal health.BMC health services research · 2012
    Review
12. HIV prevention, structural change and social values: the need for an explicit normative approach.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2012
    Review
13. Evidence-based policy revisited: orientation towards the policy process and a public health policy science.International journal of public health · 2012
    Article
14. Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Review
15. Getting research into policy - Herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) treatment and HIV infection: international guidelines formulation and the case of Ghana.Health research policy and systems · 2011
    Article
16. Health systems research in Lao PDR: capacity development for getting research into policy and practice.Health research policy and systems · 2007
    Article
17. Evidence into policy and practice? Measuring the progress of U.S. and U.K. policies to tackle disparities and inequalities in U.S. and U.K. health and health care.The Milbank quarterly · 2006
    Article
18. Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials.American journal of public health · 2004
    Article
19. A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2003
    Review
20. Assessing capacity for health policy and systems research in low and middle income countries*Health research policy and systems · 2003
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Evidence based policymaking. Academic experts don't have a monopoly on wisdom.1995
• Commented on by
  Evidence based policymaking. Policymakers may need to make a break with the past.1995

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as