Evidence map›Paper›PMID 7833218›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology1994

Clinical pharmacology, physiology and pathophysiology of superficial veins--2.

W H Aellig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct vasoactive effects of the chromogranin A (CHGA) peptide catestatin in humans in vivo.Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993) · 2010
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The effects of age on human venous responsiveness to neuropeptide Y.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1999
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Scientific Papers and Patents on Substances with Unproven Effects. Part 2.Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W H AelligSandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin IICalciumDrug InteractionsErgot AlkaloidsExtremitiesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesNitratesProstaglandinsReceptors, MuscarinicSerotoninVasoconstrictionVasoconstrictor AgentsAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin IICalciumErgot AlkaloidsNitratesProstaglandinsReceptors, MuscarinicSerotoninVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID7833218
PMCPMC1364771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.